U.N. Security Council members vote to adopt sanctions against North Korea on Thursday.
Emmanuel Dunand/AFP/Getty Images
The Security Council's actions to clamp down on the North's nuclear progam follow the country's third nuclear test that was carried out last month in defiance of previous United Nations' sanctions.
The 15-0 Security Council vote on Thursday includes China, which has backed North Korea in the past and is one of the country's few allies.
The U.S.-drafted resolution would tighten financial restrictions on North Korea and seek to prevent its efforts to trade in banned cargo that could be used in its nuclear and missile programs.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon welcomed the vote, issuing a statement that it "sent an unequivocal message to (North Korea) that the international community will not tolerate its pursuit of nuclear weapons."
The new sanctions come during a week in which Pyongyang threatened to scrap a 1953 armistice ending the Korean War if the U.S. and South Korea didn't stand down from ongoing joint military exercises in the region.
An unidentified spokesman from North Korea's Foreign Ministry said that Washington was pushing for a nuclear war against Pyongyang and that in response, the country would act on its right for "a preemptive nuclear attack to destroy the strongholds of the aggressors."
Although the North has successfully tested both nuclear bombs and long-range rockets, it is not thought to have successfully married the two into an intercontinental ballistic missile, or ICBM.
As we reported on Wednesday, South Korea has matched Pyongyang's rhetoric with its own promise to "carry out strong and resolute retaliations" if the North attacks.
According to The Washington Post, however, the North's statement might not be quite as bellicose as its English-language translation suggests:
"The Korean-language version suggested that the North would only carry out such a strike against "invaders," meaning only if another nation breached its borders. But the English-language version of the statement says the strike will be carried out against "aggressors," a more subjective term.
"'So there's some nuance in there,' said Dan Pinkston, a Seoul-based security expert for the International Crisis Group. 'It's not like a barge is going to float up the Potomac and a nuke will go off. Still, it's problematic. . . . This says something about their doctrine with nuclear weapons. It says, 'If we're invaded with conventional weapons, we will respond with nuclear strikes.' "